STUDIO NOTES
An ongoing collection of observations, reflections, and fragments.
These notes trace the ideas, questions, and experiences that shape the work before, during, and after it is made. Some remain unfinished. Others eventually become drawings. Together, they offer a glimpse into the conceptual landscape surrounding my artwork.

Detail of Ambivalent Webs, 2026
Obsession, Part I
Monday, July 20, 2026
This marks the beginning of a new body of work exploring OCD. I’ve lived with obsession for as long as I can remember and have spent much of my life navigating rituals and the uneasy space between intuition and compulsion.
Over time, I’ve realized that the same capacity for obsession doesn’t disappear when it’s directed away from fear. It finds new places to live. I become completely consumed by ideas, by making, by understanding, by noticing. I care with an intensity that is difficult to switch off.
Obsession is often understood only as something destructive, but I wonder if it also reveals an extraordinary capacity for attention. It is the ability to remain with something long enough for it to unfold, to notice what others overlook, to pursue a question without losing interest. The same force that can become imprisoning can also become a source of devotion, curiosity, and creation.
I’m interested in this tension. Obsession is not simply something to escape - it can also be a form of energy. The challenge is not eliminating it, but understanding where it is directed. When guided by fear, it narrows the world. When guided by curiosity, it has the potential to deepen it.
Perhaps it’s not only a burden. Perhaps it is also evidence of our ability to care so completely that, for a moment, we become embedded in something larger than ourselves.
Obsession, Part II
Monday, July 20, 2026
From the outside, many decisions made by someone living with obsessions and compulsions appear ordinary. Internally, they rarely feel that way. Even the smallest choice can carry an all-or-nothing quality, as though there is one correct path and every other possibility exists in opposition to it. The stakes often have little to do with the decision itself. They come from the feeling attached to it.
The logic of OCD is often internally consistent while existing completely outside objective reality. It becomes a private system of meaning, where safety and danger are defined less by what is happening than by what the body believes is happening. What feels “right” isn’t necessarily what is true. It’s what briefly restores a sense of equilibrium.
Making artwork about this feels strangely ironic. I think many people with OCD spend much of their lives trying to keep their compulsions contained. There are invisible boundaries - certain places where OCD is allowed to exist, and others that are kept separate from it. For me, the studio has often been one of those places. It’s where I could step outside these patterns of thinking.
Bringing OCD into the work disrupts that refuge. I'm choosing to speak directly about something that has remained largely invisible. There is discomfort in that, but there is also honesty. If the work asks viewers to confront uncertainty, vulnerability, or contradiction, then it feels important that I am willing to do the same.
Entanglement
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
I’ve been thinking about how my experiences become coupled.
I’m interested in the way separate experiences begin to attach themselves to one another. They may have nothing in common objectively, but because of the way they were experienced, they become inseparable. One begins to alter the meaning of the other.
It’s not exactly memory, and it isn’t déjà vu. It feels like something in between. Different moments begin to occupy the same mental space, not because they happened together, but because they resonate in a similar way.
Looking at my drawings, I realize I’m drawn to the same phenomenon visually. Images overlap. Forms emerge through one another. Separate structures remain distinct while also refusing to stay separate. I’m interested in the point where two things coexist long enough that a third reading begins to emerge.
I don’t think I’ve been consciously making work about this. It seems more accurate to say that it’s a way of perceiving that has gradually found its way into the work. Looking back, it’s been there long before I had language for it.